Search This Blog

Saturday, September 15, 2012

From Model T to C-3PO

The year is 1913 and the Ford Motor Company is about to revolutionize the way manufacturing works. Piece by piece and worker by worker the Model T was produced in a way that had never been done before. Each individual on the workroom floor was responsible for assembling a piece of the Model T as it was pulled by them on a rope and trolley system. The simple addition of an assembly line eventually would lower the price of the Model T to a level where the average American consumer could finally purchase a vehicle, Henry Ford’s dream.


The functionality and ability of an assembly line to cut production time and cost of goods hasn’t changed very much in the last 100 years. The technology behind it, however, has. The manufacturing process has started to move in a direction where an assembly line no longer needs to be run by a human being, who needs to be paid and rested after a work day. Instead the assembly lines are beginning to be run by robots. These robots can run 24/7, 365 days of the year, don’t need to get paid, and can perform the required work at a much faster pace than even the best trained human could.

This is a good thing, right? An increase in production time and a decrease in salaries results in a cheaper good for people to buy and a potential for financial growth within the company using the assembly. The downside to it all is the loss of human jobs. Many people depend on manufacturing assembly line jobs to earn a living and care for their families. If these jobs are taken away, will that hurt a society’s economy, standard of living or lifestyle. What do you think? Is it more important to maximized efficiency in production or ensure the wellbeing of the human race? Is there a healthy balance? 

1 comment:

  1. If you ask me, I wouldn't be surprised if machines take over the assembly line and manufacturing even more. If this cuts the costs that corporations were originally having to pay to employees each day, then I'm sure those people who are not affected by these lay-offs would love this idea. At first it would make them more wealthy, but then you have to think about who they are selling their product to. All of those being laid off for these reasons might not have the money to purchase their product any longer and eventually affecting those that made the instant wealth in the beginning.

    ReplyDelete